Mn Transfer Header Image Search the Mn Transfer site Privacy Statement Feedback Form About this site Mn Transfer Home What's New Mn Transfer Home

Accounting Transfer Meeting Notes
Tuesday, January 25, 2005 [1]
9:00 a.m. – 2:30 p.m.
Conference Room 304, ETC Building
1450 Energy Park Drive, St. Paul, MN 55108-5227

Participants

University faculty: Bruce Busta, St. Cloud State University; Grover Cleveland and Dennis Daly, Metropolitan State University; Lee Dexter, Minnesota State University-Moorhead; Mary Rolfes, Minnesota State University-Mankato; Dick Schneider, Winona State University; Madalyn Wick, Bemidji State University

College faculty: Gary Fischer (Wadena) and  Jean McKenzie (Fergus Falls), Minnesota State Community and Technical College; Doris Loes, Dakota County Technical College; Bonnie Ohrt, South Central Technical College; Barbara Prince, Anoka-Ramsey Community College; Ron Strittmater, North Hennepin Community College; Roy Vinkemeier, Saint Paul College

Administration: Gary Seiler, Metropolitan State University; Mary Weisensel, Saint Paul College; Jerry Johnson and Larry Selin, Chancellor’s Office

Meeting Focus

This meeting continued the work of refining course guidelines documents for state college courses to be considered equivalents to university accounting courses: Principles of Accounting I & II (aka Financial and Managerial Accounting) and Metropolitan State University’s Strategic Management Accounting (Acct320). Building on the guidelines coming out of the December 7, 2004 meeting, university representatives consulted with their respective faculties and added refinements. College faculty participants shared their experience with transfer and asked clarifying questions.

The second part of the meeting addressed next steps toward attaining formal university approvals of the guidelines, using the guidelines to review proposed equivalencies, and improving access to information about approved equivalencies for students and advisors.

Notes

1.      Guidelines. Each of the three guidelines documents were revised further. Mary Rolfes agreed to add illustrative course outcomes for the Accounting I & II guidelines. Dennis Daly and Grover Cleveland will make additional refinements to Metropolitan State University’s Strategic Management guidelines. The resulting documents will be returned to the university accounting departments for review and approval. University faculty consensus was that approvals could be obtained within two weeks of receipt.

a.      North Hennepin CC and Anoka-Ramsey CC reported successful transfer of their managerial accounting courses to both Metropolitan State University’s Strategic Management Accounting and Principles of Accounting II at other state universities.

2.      Process. When approved, the course guidelines will be distributed to all the college accounting programs, along with information about a system-wide review of proposed equivalent courses to be conducted in April 2005.

3.      Course Review. Initial course review ideas:  (NOT confirmed at this time.)

a.      Target to complete reviews by the end of April 2005.
i.        Course proposals due from colleges by April 11.
ii.       Course review meeting April 22.
b.      Course materials submitted for review will include course outlines and information about how learning outcomes are assessed.
c.      Reviewers will include representatives from all seven university accounting programs.
d.      Approvals will include a beginning date. The beginning date may be in the past if reviewers agree that the approved course exists already. The beginning date may be in the future, if the course includes significant changes scheduled to commence in the future.
e.      After this initial review process, significant changes to courses approved as equivalent must be reported to the receiving institutions.

4.      Courses approved through this review process will have established equivalencies with all seven universities for Principles of Accounting I (or Financial Accounting) and the six universities offering Principles of Accounting II (or Managerial Accounting). Proposed equivalencies with Metropolitan State University’s Acct 320 will also be reviewed.

5.      This opportunity to propose new equivalencies is not intended to rescind or undo existing equivalencies. Colleges seeking equivalency relationships with all the universities are expected to participate in this system-wide process.

6.      Communications Improvements. Steps will be pursued to improve access to transfer information for students and advisors. The goal is to eliminate opportunities for misunderstanding about how accounting courses at one System institution may satisfy program requirements at another.

a.      Courses approved through this system-wide review process may be identified with a standard designation: e.g., “Approved for equivalency with MnSCU state university accounting courses Principles of Accounting I or Financial Accounting.”
b.      Approved equivalencies will be recorded in the Course Applicability System (CAS), which serves as the official, system-wide repository for equivalency agreements. CAS entries include beginning dates for equivalency agreements.
c.      Means of linking to equivalency information from online catalogs and other online information about accounting courses and programs should be explored.
d.      The use of course naming or numbering conventions to distinguish courses that transfer to baccalaureate programs and from those that don’t was deemed impracticable.

Next Steps

  • Transfer Office will distribute revised course guidelines documents to all participants: to the university accounting programs for review and approval.
  • Transfer Office will draft review process materials based on the meeting discussion: announcement and submission guidelines, review guidelines and forms, calendar, etc.

Draft Course Guidelines

1. Principles of Accounting I or Financial Accounting <Attached>

2. Principles of Accounting II or Managerial Accounting <Attached>

3. Strategic Management Accounting (Metropolitan State University) <Will follow later>


Revision #3, based on Accounting Faculty Meeting, January 25, 2005

Revision #2, based on Accounting Faculty Feedback by January 24, 2005

Revision #1, based on Accounting Faculty Meeting, December 7, 2004

Original draft was based on previous Accounting faculty committee report, May 2003 [2]

Course Guidelines for Equivalent Accounting Courses to Course #1

Title Suggestion or Standards—to help distinguish courses approved for transfer.

Principles of Accounting I or Financial Accounting

Preamble Statement (explanation of the guideline including reason for it, how developed, how used, includes both land-based and on-line courses, etc.)

This guideline was developed to facilitate transfer of the first two accounting courses among Minnesota State Colleges and Universities. These two courses are required for most baccalaureate business programs.

This guideline was developed by faculty representatives of the seven state university accounting programs and included consultation with their college faculty colleagues.

This guideline is applicable to land-based courses and MnOnline courses.

Course Description (include clarification of course purpose: preparer, user, or preparer and user)

Covers financial accounting concepts from a “user” perspective and focuses on the application of these concepts in real-world environments. The central theme emphasizes how economic information is identified, measured, and communicated.  This course places greater emphasis on analysis and decision-making than on the recording of debits and credits, which is a “preparer” perspective.

(See course content in a subsequent section.)

Prerequisites

Grade of C or better in the course being transferred, Principles of Accounting I or Financial Accounting.

Total Number of Credits

Minimum of 3 or 4 semester credits.

More than accounting knowledge, the higher level learning outcomes of Bloom’s Taxonomy—comprehension, analysis and evaluation—are sought; at least 80% of the outcomes must reflect these higher levels. 

Listed below are three comprehensive outcomes for this course.  Immediately following each outcome is an example of a measurable outcome.

1.      Comprehension of the strategic role of financial accounting information in a strategic decision making environment.  An example of an outcome is this area might be:

“Ability to compare and contrast the cash and accrual bases of accounting for revenues and expenses.”

2.      Critical analytical ability to apply the relevant accounting concepts and principles to decision making situations.  An example of an outcome in this area might be:

“Ability to evaluate the impact on the financial statements of using various inventory costing methods.”

3.      Ability to evaluate the applicability of financial information to strategic decision making.  An example of an outcome in this area might be:

“Ability to assess the financial strengths and weaknesses of an organization by analyzing the financial statements utilizing ratio and other analysis methods.”

Standards for Evaluating Student Learning Outcomes

Student learning outcomes must be assessed through the use of examinations and other appropriate evaluative tools.

Textbook Name/Author/Publisher/Edition (examples of acceptable textbooks)

University-level textbook with a user emphasis.

The accounting model

Financial Statements: balance sheet, income statement, statement of owner’s equity, and disclosures

Income measurement and accrual accounting

Accounting Principles & Assumptions (Accounting Theory)

Merchandise accounting and internal control

Accounting for assets—including current, fixed, and other assets

Time value of money

Accounting for liabilities—including current and long term liabilities

Accounting for owners’ equity–including the different forms of ownership of sole proprietor, partnerships, and corporations

Statement of Cash Flows (needed by Metropolitan State University and MSU Mankato*)

Financial Statement Analysis (needed by Metro and MSU Mankato*)

*The Statement of Cash Flows and Financial Statement Analysis are covered by the remainder of the state universities in the Principles of Accounting II or Managerial Accounting course.

Note: The pair of courses described in these guidelines, Principles of Accounting I & II, will transfer to Moorhead as substitutes for its Principles I & II sequence.  Students seeking to transfer only the financial course (Principles I) will take a 1-credit bridge course at MSU Moorhead to prepare for the managerial course (Principles II).


Revision #3, based on Accounting Faculty Meeting, January 25, 2005

Revision #2, based on Accounting Faculty Feedback by January 24, 2005

Revision #1, based on Accounting Faculty Meeting, December 7, 2004

Original draft was based on previous Accounting faculty committee report, May 2003 [3]

Course Guidelines for Equivalent Accounting Courses to Course #2

Title Suggestion or Standards—to help distinguish courses approved for transfer.

Principles of Accounting II or Managerial Accounting

Preamble Statement (explanation of the guideline including reason for it, how developed, how used, includes both land-based and on-line courses, etc.)

This guideline was developed to facilitate transfer of the first two accounting courses among Minnesota State Colleges and Universities. These two courses are required for most baccalaureate business programs.

This guideline was developed by faculty representatives of the seven state university accounting programs and included consultation with their college faculty colleagues.

This guideline is applicable to land-based courses and MnOnline courses.

Course Description (include clarification of course purpose: preparer, user, or preparer and user)

This course focuses on strategic decision-making related to cost analysis and cost management. Topics include product costing, cost-volume-profit analysis, activity-based costing, how costs behave, relevant information, capital budgeting, and performance measurement. Thus, the focus is on use of information rather than its preparation. 

Prerequisites

Principles of Accounting I or Financial Accounting or equivalent

Total Number of Credits

Minimum of 3 or 4 semester credits

More than accounting knowledge, the higher level learning outcomes of Bloom’s Taxonomy—comprehension, analysis and evaluation—are sought; at least 80% of the outcomes must reflect these higher levels. 

Listed below are three comprehensive outcomes for this course.  Immediately following each outcome is an example of a measurable outcome.

1.      Comprehension of the strategic role of financial and non-financial accounting information in a strategic decision making environment.  An example of an outcome in this area might be:

“Ability to describe, compare and contrast traditional and contemporary management accounting systems.”

2.      Critical analytical ability to apply the relevant accounting concepts and principles to decision making situations.  An example of an outcome in this area might be:

“Ability to evaluate capital investment opportunities using appropriate investment analysis techniques.”

3.      Ability to evaluate the applicability of financial and non-financial information to strategic decision making.  An example of an outcome in this area might be:

“Ability to compile and analyze financial and non-financial information to differentiate among choices in making short-run non-routine decisions.”

Standards for Evaluating Student Learning Outcomes

Student learning outcomes must be assessed through the use of examinations and other appropriate evaluative tools.

University-level textbook with a user emphasis.

Course Content-Topics Taught

Statement of cash flows*

Financial statement analysis*

Cost concepts and terminology

Product Costing

Activity based costing

Cost behavior

Cost-volume-profit analysis

Relevant costs

Budgeting

Standard costing

Decentralization, performance evaluation, transfer pricing

Capital Budgeting

* This topic covered by Metropolitan State University and MSU Mankato in the first course, Financial Accounting.

Note: The pair of courses described in these guidelines, Principles of Accounting I & II, will transfer to Moorhead as substitutes for its Principles I & II sequence.  Students seeking to transfer only the financial course (Principles I) will take a 1-credit bridge course at MSU Moorhead to prepare for the managerial course (Principles II).



[1] This meeting continues the work of the Accounting Transfer Meeting, December 7, 2004.

[2] Illustrative content derived from current catalogs and accounting committee report, May 2003. http://www.mntansfer.org/facdisc/accounting/accountingfinalreport_may03.html

[3] Illustrative content derived from current catalogs and accounting committee report, May 2003. http://www.mntansfer.org/facdisc/accounting/accountingfinalreport_may03.html

            Home   What's New   About Site   Feedback   Privacy   Search

*Information found on this web site can be made available in alternative format to individuals with disabilities by calling
651-296-8012, 1-888-667-2848 or TTY: 651-282-2660

Questions or Feedback?
Contact mntransfer@so.mnscu.edu